Saturday, November 12, 2011

Android ICS Face Unlock fooled by digital photo

Face Unlock, the latest security feature in Google's Android "Ice Cream Sandwich" that unlocks a phone via facial recognition, is not that foolproof after all.


A blogger showed the facial recognition technology may have worked too well, unlocking the phone if it is presented with a digital picture.


"While some of you think that it is a trick and I had set the Galaxy Nexus up to recognise the picture, I assure you that the device was set up to recognise my face. I have a few people there watching me do the video and if any one of them is watching this video I hope you can confirm that this test is 100% legit," he said in a YouTube video.



An article on The Huffington Post said the video has gone viral.

The Huffington Post noted that with people likely to have their images all over the Internet such as on Facebook and Twitter, facial recognition "could be a potentially serious flaw in Android 4.0."

"Of course, all this would require the person who's trying to break into your mobile to know your identity, so we suppose it's not something worth worrying about if you lose your phone and your identity is no way tied to it (i.e. you don't have your name on the phone)," it said.

It also noted TheNextWeb's Matt Brian had quoted Tim Bray, Android Developer Advocate at Google, had denied via Twitter that a photo could be used to break into the phone when the issue was raised last month.

Bray has so far not yet commented on the issue, the Huffington Post said.

'Only experimental'

On the other hand, a separate article on CNET said a Google representative it contacted said the feature is considered low security and experimental.

It said even the interface warns users that "Face Unlock is less secure than a pattern, PIN, or password" and that "Someone who looks similar to you could unlock your phone."

"It's also true that someone would have to plan ahead to have a photo of a target and wait for that person to leave the phone unattended to get access to a device locked with the feature. There is no question that using this low-level security feature is better than not locking the phone at all, as long as you understand the limitations," it said.

$79 Kindle costs $84 to make: Analyst

Is this true? how come they would like to sell a thing that would not make money instead  it will make loose a business. Here is the article from http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com.


SAN FRANCISCO: A recent analysis from IHS iSuppli determined that Amazon's $79 Kindle e-reader, which is the online retailer's cheapest Kindle thus far, costs $84.25 to make.

In the report, iSuppli said the total cost of materials for the Kindle is $78.59, including $30.50 for the e-reader's 6-inch E-ink display. The market researcher estimates manufacturing costs run $5.66 per device.

IHS iSuppli notes that these costs don't include any of Amazon.com Inc's development costs for the Kindle, or costs related to things such as shipping and distribution of the device.

Even if Amazon pays more to build the $79 Kindle than it sells it for, the company has several other ways to bring in money from the device. This Kindle model includes ads that show up as screensavers and at the bottom of the device's home screen.

And Amazon sees all the devices in the Kindle family - and the free Kindle apps it offers for mobile devices and computers - as a way to spur more sales of its digital e-books, music, games and apps.

Amazon has repeatedly lowered the price of the Kindle and added more devices to the Kindle lineup since it began selling the first one in late 2007 for $399. The $79 version, which the Seattle-based company started selling in late September, eschews the keyboard found on earlier Kindle models.

Amazon will begin shipping touch-screen Kindles ($99 to $189) and its first tablet computer, the Kindle Fire ($199), later this month. Amazon still offers a Kindle that includes a physical keyboard, too.

Amazon has not said how many Kindles it has sold.

Sony CEO claims company ready to take on Apple

Another history in the making, if this would happen this will change everything that started from the brilliant man Steve Jobs. Here is an article from http://www.mobile-computing-news.co.uk.

In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, Sony CEO Sir Howard Stringer claims that his firm is also working on a next-generation television, much like Apple did. He explained that he spent the last five years of his tenor at the company working on a platform to compete with the iPhone maker, and that Sony is on the verge of capitalising on it.

FOUR-SCREEN STRATEGY TO TAKE ON APPLE
Sony CEO Sir Howard Stringer spoke at a breakfast hosted by the WSJ about his company’s oft-mentioned four-screen strategy – tablet, smartphone, laptop and television – and that the technology to drive the platform was ready. ‘I spent the last five years building a platform so I can compete against Steve Jobs,’ he says, claiming that ‘it’s finished, and it’s launching now.’

NEW AGE SONY TV
While the smartphones, tablets, and laptops are already here in the form Sony wants them, Stringer revealed that his team was working on a new age television solution – not dissimilar from Apple’s oft-rumoured television ambitions.

He told the gathering that at Sony ‘There’s a tremendous amount of R&D going into a different kind of TV set.’ He continued, saying, ‘We can’t continue selling TV sets [as we currently do]. Every TV set we all make loses money.’

VASTLY DIFFERENT FORTUNES
Sony CEO Sir Howard Stringer is most certainly not lying, with his company’s television unit racking up losses eight years running, with the latest report pegging the unit at losing an incredible $2.2 billion (£1.38bn) this year.

Sony’s entire business is under immense pressure, while Apple is wracking up success after success. Sony CEO Sir Howard Stringer is on his way out soon, though, so he likely won’t be around to enjoy the success – if any is to come – of his company’s four-screen strategy.

New ‘Call of Duty’ blows away sales records- AFP

SAN FRANCISCO: “Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3,” the latest installment of the blockbuster videogame franchise, blew away sales records on its first day to become the highest-grossing entertainment launch ever, publisher Activision said Friday.

“Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3” raked in over $400 million in Britain and North America in the first 24 hours of its release, selling more than 6.5 million copies, Activision said.

That eclipsed Hollywood’s biggest blockbusters and last year’s “Call of Duty: Black Ops,” which reaped $360 million on its first day and sold 5.6 million copies in Britain and North America.

“We believe the launch of ‘Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3′ is the biggest entertainment launch of all time in any medium, and we achieved this record with sales from only two territories,” Activision Blizzard chief executive Bobby Kotick said.

“Other than Call of Duty, there has never been another entertainment franchise that has set opening day records three years in a row,” he said.

Kotick said total sales for the Call of Duty franchise, which was launched in 2003, exceed worldwide theatrical box office receipts for “Star Wars” and “Lord of the Rings.”

“Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3” was released Tuesday and fans lined up at stores around the world to purchase the military first-person shooter game, the eighth title in the “Call of Duty” franchise.

“Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3,” which was developed by Infinity Ward and Sledgehammer Games, picks up the storyline from “Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2” and segues into World War 3.

“Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2” pulled in $310 million when it went on sale in 2009. Santa Monica, California-based Activision is a subsidiary of Activision Blizzard.

Google Acquires Apture to Improve Chrome

Today, i received an email from apture.com regarding Google purchases the company for better services in the future. Here is an article from http://www.toptechreviews.net about this


Google recently purchased Apture, which is a startup based in San Francisco. It has technology that adds contextual links as a user browse through the internet. Then it would provide information in a new window when the user hovers over the links.

Apture founder Tristan Harris said that the Chrome team from Google helped with the deal but he didn’t give any details as to what the search giant plans to do with the technology. The obvious answer would be hat Google will use the acquired technology to add more links to its services within Chrome.

Apture’s technology could be used in the browser to highlight addresses within web pages. Users could then be taken to Local listings or Google Maps when they hover over the addresses. At present, Chrome is used by Google to make searches easier. Users find it easier to search using Chrome’s address bar than any other browsers.

Chrome also makes sure that Google influence web standards and keep its services within users’ reach. Larry Page said that Chrome is a vital part of Google’s long term plan. The company has put a lot of money in advertising its web browser this year. More links to Google services from within the Chrome bowser would justify its investment.

Adobe Flash Player for Android, BlackBerry PlayBook gets a final update

Steve Jobs was right, ADOBE halted to released adobe updates to mobile. Here is the update regarding adobe about adobe flash player to your mobile phone from http://www.techshout.com


Contrary to popular belief, Adobe does not dislike HTML and the Adobe Flash Player for Android, BlackBerry PlayBook 11.1 update is going to be the last from the company. Since major mobile devices happen to be offering support for HTML5, it is apparently the best solution for content distribution across mobile platforms.

All of this works out to the headlines that Adobe is going the HTML5 way and the guys over at Apple are probably sitting around sporting smug smiles across their faces. Well, it’s been coming for quite some time now and it was just back in July this year when ABI pronounced that ‘the disappearance of Flash is close than people think’, while predicting that 2.1 billion HTML5 browsers would make it to mobile devices by 2016.


“Part of Adobe’s story is enabling cross-platform solutions, but since Flash has never been supported on iOS, we weren’t able to deliver on that vision in the context of mobile browsers. With mobile browsers as good as they are now (the ICS browser looks amazing, and mobile Safari has always been awesome), it just makes more sense to use HTML,” says Christian Cantrell, Adobe AIR Application Developer, Product Manager.
So in defense of Adobe, Cupertino never really gave it a chance of establishing any sort of ubiquity across mobile platforms owing to the lack of support for Flash on iOS devices. The official Adobe blog insists that the company will work with big names in the HTML community including Google, Apple, Microsoft and RIM over advancing this emerging web standard for the mobile platform.

Though the latest Adobe Flash Player for Android, BlackBerry PlayBook update will be the last one, the company promises to deliver bug fixes and security updates for existing device configurations in the future.